3D Gaussian Splatting vs. NeRFs. What is the difference? ๐ค
In the world of computer vision, 3D Gaussian Splatting and NeRFs are gaining traction.
Curiosity: But what sets them apart? Hereโs a quick breakdown:
Comparison Overview
Retrieve: Key differences between NeRF and 3D Gaussian Splatting.
graph TB
A[3D Scene Representation] --> B[NeRF]
A --> C[3D Gaussian Splatting]
B --> B1[Continuous Space]
B --> B2[Neural Network]
B --> B3[Point Sampling]
C --> C1[Sparse Points]
C --> C2[Direct Optimization]
C --> C3[Gaussian Ellipsoids]
style A fill:#e1f5ff
style B fill:#fff3cd
style C fill:#d4edda
Detailed Comparison
| Aspect | NeRF | 3D Gaussian Splatting |
|---|---|---|
| 3D Space | Continuous | Sparse points |
| Point Generation | Sampling per image | Structure from Motion |
| Representation | RGBA + viewing direction | Gaussians (shape, size, transparency, color) |
| Color Description | View-dependent | Spherical harmonics |
| Optimization | Neural network | Direct optimization |
| Output | Continuous function | Discrete ellipsoids |
| Approach | Neural, continuous | Geometric, discrete |
1. 3D Space Representation
Retrieve: Different approaches to representing 3D space.
NeRF:
- Creates continuous 3D space
- Samples points throughout scene
- Per training image sampling
Gaussian Splatting:
- Relies on sparse 3D points
- Often uses Structure from Motion
- More efficient representation
2. Point Description
Retrieve: How each method describes scene points.
NeRF:
- RGBA color per point
- Viewing direction dependency
- Appearance varies with location and angle
Gaussian Splatting:
- Complex 3D Gaussian forms
- Varying shapes, sizes, transparency
- Color described with spherical harmonics
- More flexible representation
3. Optimization
Innovate: Different optimization strategies.
NeRF:
- Neural network learns continuous function
- Color and opacity functions
- Implicit representation
Gaussian Splatting:
- Direct optimization of ellipsoid properties
- No neural network needed
- Explicit discrete structure
- Faster training
Architecture Comparison
graph LR
A[Input Images] --> B[NeRF]
A --> C[Gaussian Splatting]
B --> D[Neural Network]
D --> E[Continuous Function]
C --> F[Direct Optimization]
F --> G[Discrete Gaussians]
style B fill:#fff3cd
style C fill:#d4edda
When to Use Each
Retrieve: Choosing the right approach for your application.
| Use Case | Recommended | Reason |
|---|---|---|
| High Quality | NeRF | Continuous representation |
| Fast Training | Gaussian Splatting | Direct optimization |
| Real-time Rendering | Gaussian Splatting | Efficient discrete structure |
| Research | NeRF | Neural approach flexibility |
| Production | Gaussian Splatting | Faster, more practical |
Key Takeaways
Retrieve: NeRF offers a continuous, neural approach to 3D scene representation, while 3D Gaussian Splatting provides a simpler, directly optimized discrete structure with faster training and rendering.
Innovate: By understanding the trade-offs between continuous neural representations and discrete geometric approaches, you can choose the right method for your specific applicationโwhether prioritizing quality, speed, or practicality.
Curiosity โ Retrieve โ Innovation: Start with curiosity about 3D scene representation, retrieve insights from comparing NeRF and Gaussian Splatting, and innovate by applying the right approach to your 3D graphics or AR applications.
Next Steps:
- Explore NeRF implementations
- Try 3D Gaussian Splatting
- Compare performance
- Choose based on your needs
Information About 3D Gaussian Splatting
- Blog : https://xoft.tistory.com/74
Translate to Korean
์ปดํจํฐ ๋น์ ์ ์ธ๊ณ์์๋ 3D Gaussian Splatting ๋ฐ NeRF๊ฐ ์ฃผ๋ชฉ์ ๋ฐ๊ณ ์์ต๋๋ค. ๊ทธ๋ฌ๋ ๋ฌด์์ด ๊ทธ๋ค์ ์ฐจ๋ณํํฉ๋๊น? ๋ค์์ ๊ฐ๋จํ ๋ถ์์ ๋๋ค.
๐ 3D ๊ณต๊ฐ ํํ:
- NeRF: ๊ฐ ํ์ต ์ด๋ฏธ์ง์ ๋ํด ์ฅ๋ฉด ์ ์ฒด์ ์ง์ ์ ์ํ๋งํ์ฌ ์ฐ์ 3D ๊ณต๊ฐ์ ๋ง๋ญ๋๋ค.
- ๊ฐ์ฐ์์ ์คํ๋ํ (Gaussian Splatting): ์ข ์ข ๋ชจ์ ์ ๊ตฌ์กฐ(Structure from Motion)๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ฌ ์์ฑ๋๋ ํฌ์ 3D ํฌ์ธํธ ์ธํธ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํฉ๋๋ค.
๐จ ํฌ์ธํธ ์ค๋ช :
- ๊ฐ์ฐ์์ ์คํ๋ํ : ๊ตฌํ ๊ณ ์กฐํ๋ก ์ค๋ช ๋๋ ๋ค์ํ ๋ชจ์, ํฌ๊ธฐ, ํฌ๋ช ๋ ๋ฐ ์์์ ๊ฐ์ง ๊ฐ์ฐ์์์ด๋ผ๋ ๋ณต์กํ 3D ํํ๋ฅผ ์ฌ์ฉํฉ๋๋ค.
- NeRF: ๊ฐ ํฌ์ธํธ์ RGBA ์์๊ณผ ๋ณด๊ธฐ ๋ฐฉํฅ์ ํ ๋นํ๋ฉฐ, ๋ชจ์์ ์์น ๋ฐ ์์ผ๊ฐ์ ๋ฐ๋ผ ๋ฌ๋ผ์ง๋๋ค.
โ๏ธ ์ต์ ํ:
- NeRF: ์ ๊ฒฝ๋ง์ ์ฌ์ฉํ์ฌ ์์ ๋ฐ ๋ถํฌ๋ช ๋์ ๋ํ ์ฐ์ ํจ์๋ฅผ ํ์ตํฉ๋๋ค.
- Gaussian Splatting: ์ ๊ฒฝ๋ง ์์ด ๊ฐ 3D ํ์์ฒด์ ์์ฑ์ ์ง์ ์ต์ ํํ์ฌ ๊ฐ๋ณ ํ์์ฒด ์ธํธ๋ฅผ ์์ฑํฉ๋๋ค.
๋ณธ์ง์ ์ผ๋ก NeRF๋ ์ฐ์์ ์ธ ์ ๊ฒฝ ์ ๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์์ ์ ๊ณตํ๋ ๋ฐ๋ฉด, Gaussian Splatting์ ๋ ๊ฐ๋จํ๊ณ ์ง์ ์ต์ ํ๋ ์ด์ฐ ๊ตฌ์กฐ๋ฅผ ์ ๊ณตํฉ๋๋ค.
3D ๊ทธ๋ํฝ๊ณผ AR ์ ํ๋ฆฌ์ผ์ด์ ์ ์ด๋ค ์ ๊ทผ ๋ฐฉ์์ด ๋ ํฅ๋ฏธ๋กญ๋ค๊ณ ์๊ฐํ์ญ๋๊น? ๋๊ธ๋ก ์๊ฐ์ ๊ณต์ ํ์ธ์! ๐ฌ
Working on something like this?
I take a small number of paid, scoped reviews: AI agent/RAG architecture diagnosis, Unity CI & build-automation audits, and multimodal QA design review. Each one ends in a written findings document.
Work with me